GOP Resistance to One Big Beautiful Bill Signals Party Shifts

Extension of Trump-Era Tax Cuts and New Deductions

The U.S. Congress has passed the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” of 2025. Its passing is a major fulfillment of many of President Donald Trump’s second-term fiscal promises. Trump’s bill extends the expiring 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) provisions, adds deductions for tips, overtime, and Social Security, and modestly increases child tax credits. It also raises the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap.

Spending Increases and Cuts to Democratic Priorities

The bill increases spending on Republican priorities, such as defense and immigration enforcement, including funds for the border wall and ICE. To partially offset these costs, the bill eliminates tax credits for electric vehicles, imposes new taxes and tax increases on green energy with high foreign content, and enacts reduced spending on food assistance programs like Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, “food stamps”) as well as Medicaid cuts.

Rising Deficits and the 2028 Fiscal Cliff

Despite the spending cuts, the Congressional Budget Office projects a $3.4 trillion increase in deficits from 2025–2034, potentially rising to $4.8 trillion due to front-loaded tax cuts and delayed spending cuts. These dynamics create a fiscal cliff in 2028, likely leading to further extensions and increased deficits.

Limited Economic and Foreign Policy Impact

While the White House claims the bill will help the working class, many experts express concern that the bill’s economic boost is minimal as most tax cuts were anticipated. Defense spending remains below NATO commitments, limiting U.S. foreign policy ambitions. Key proposals like Section 899 were dropped, and there’s no effort to address potential funding issues with safety nets like Social Security or Medicare. Both are concerns among many low-income constituents in both Democratic and GOP-dominated states, especially leading up to midterms.

Shift in Republican Party Priorities

Vice President JD Vance passed a tie-breaker in the Senate version of the bill in a 51-50 vote, with Susan Collins of Maine, Rand Paul of Kentucky, and Thom Tillis of North Carolina dissenting from the Senate Republican majority. The House of Representatives showed a similarly tight vote, with the bill passing 218-214, with only two House GOP representatives, Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, dissenting from the Republican majority.

The ultimate passing of the bill reflects a political shift in GOP leader priorities in the U.S. Capitol, sidelining fiscal and foreign policy hawks in favor of the MAGA movement. While the bill fulfills reelection campaign promises for the Trump Administration, it heightens long-term debt risks, like the ballooning national debt, and challenges future U.S. fiscal stability.

Download Report

Disclaimer

Non Independent Research
This document is issued by Coöperatieve Rabobank U.A. incorporated in the Netherlands, trading as “Rabobank” (“Rabobank”) a cooperative with excluded liability. The liability of its members is limited. Authorised by De Nederlandsche Bank in the Netherlands and regulated by the Authoriteit Financiële Markten. Rabobank London Branch (RL) is authorised by De Nederlandsche Bank, the Netherlands and the Prudential Regulation Authority, and subject to regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority and limited regulation by the Prudential Regulation Authority. Further details are available on request. RL is registered in England and Wales under Company no. FC11780 and under Branch No. BR002630. This document is directed exclusively to Eligible Counterparties and Professional Clients. It is not directed at Retail Clients.

This document does not purport to be impartial research and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of Investment Research and is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of Investment Research. This document does NOT purport to be an impartial assessment of the value or prospects of its subject matter and it must not be relied upon by any recipient as an impartial assessment of the value or prospects of its subject matter. No reliance may be placed by a recipient on any representations or statements made outside this document (oral or written) by any person which state or imply (or may be reasonably viewed as stating or implying) any such impartiality.

This document is for information purposes only and is not, and should not be construed as, an offer or a commitment by RL or any of its affiliates to enter into a transaction. This document does not constitute investment advice and nor is any information provided intended to offer sufficient information such that is should be relied upon for the purposes of making a decision in relation to whether to acquire any financial products. The information and opinions contained in this document have been compiled or arrived at from sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to their accuracy, completeness or correctness.

The information contained in this document is not to be relied upon by the recipient as authoritative or taken in substitution for the exercise of judgement by any recipient. Any opinions, forecasts or estimates herein constitute a judgement of RL as at the date of this document, and there can be no assurance that future results or events will be consistent with any such opinions, forecasts or estimates. All opinions expressed in this document are subject to change without notice.

To the extent permitted by law, neither RL, nor other legal entities in the group to which it belongs accept any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss howsoever arising from any use of this document or its contents or otherwise arising in connection therewith.

Insofar as permitted by applicable laws and regulations, RL or other legal entities in the group to which it belongs, their directors, officers and/or employees may have had or have a long or short position or act as a market maker and may have traded or acted as principal in the securities described within this document (or related investments) or may otherwise have conflicting interests. This may include hedging transactions carried out by RL or other legal entities in the group, and such hedging transactions may affect the value and/or liquidity of the securities described in this document.

Further it may have or have had a relationship with or may provide or have provided corporate finance or other services to companies whose securities (or related investments) are described in this document.

Further, internal and external publications may have been issued prior to this publication where strategies may conflict according to market conditions at the time of each publication.

This document may not be reproduced, distributed or published, in whole or in part, for any purpose, except with the prior written consent of RL. By accepting this document you agree to be bound by the foregoing restrictions.

The distribution of this document in other jurisdictions may be restricted by law and recipients of this document should inform themselves about, and observe any such restrictions.

A summary of the methodology can be found on our website